What is the difference between religion and science?
Note carefully that both science and religion share a perspective in that they are deemed as a rational compendium of beliefs.
Can science be deemed rational, when religion says it is irrational? Or, can religion be deemed rational when science says it is irrational?
Who has the real say in discounting someone else’s beliefs for the sake of their own?
Religion requires faith as it has no proof of said deity or verifiability of its doctrine. Science branches out into many areas where research and study takes place to make determinations, it has physical and tangible material to work with. The ‘irrationality’ of science, cut the mortality rate from infection due to the discovery of antibiotics, X ray machines so the the inside of your body can be examined to determine appropriate treatment, the vast amounts of study and research by scientist have benefited us all – to dismiss it a irrational is illogical. What can religion cure? What can it give us that is new? Nothing. 2000 years – and nothing, but the insistence the we obey or suffer. And that too, without evidence to back it up.
Only one of them is true. Guess who?
References :
religion is based on authority science is based on observation and reason
References :
What is the difference between monkeys and doughnuts?
References :
fact vs faith
References :
They couldn’t be more different. Why don’t you buy yourself a dictionary and start there. Questions like this are a waste of time.
You’re attempt at making them sound equivalent is ludicrous. Science is based on empirical data and religion is made up on the spot.
Your last question is easily answered. The person with the say is the rational, logical person. Sure they won’t agree on who this is, but its very telling that the smarter someone is, the less likely they are to be religious or hold ‘beliefs’ of any kind.
References :
Science= facts
Religion= fiction
References :
Religion gains its followers by faith.
Ie, religion is based on a disability to disprove its existence. After all, disprove it and the religion would lose most, if not all, of its followers.
Science however, bases its knowledge on what it ‘can’ be proven, not focussing on what cannot.
References :
I think you don’t know what science is!
References :
Religion takes authority as truth.
Science takes truth as authority.
References :
science have nothing to do with rationality science is nothing but seeing, hearing, tasting, smelling, touching, thats all. Science is practice of your 5 senses and if you don’t know that then you never went to grade school, that’s all what science is about
science does not equal to philosophy or critical thinking okay
References :
A religion is something you have faith in that it is true, but can not really prove it
References :
science is true and makes sense.
religion is a bunch of shit story’s a few insane skitzos came up with.
References :
I believe there is a common misconception about religion and science. Some hardcore religionists say that science is false and we must only believe what is in scripture, and likewise some scientists are "too smart" for religion because they believe in empirical evidence. There is absolutely no conflict between true science and true religion, the conflict arises when we compare false religion with true science or true religion with the false theories of men. God is a god of truth and acts in perfect harmony with all scientific law. For example, we know that it is religious truth that Adam and Eve were the first humans that God put on Earth, however it is also scientific fact that natural selection happens in nature. Isn’t it possible that God could create Adam and Eve (and the entire physical world) with the ability to adapt to its surroundings through natural selection? Makes sense to me anyways. God understands the laws of nature perfectly, laws which we humans do not fully comprehend and therefore when we take it upon ourselves to discredit God or science based on a very limited knowledge we’re making a very misguided judgement. Anyways, sorry for the rant. But just remember true Science and true Religion will never conflict because all truth is harmonious with itself. Hope that helped!
References :
Science is about developing and testing theories based on observable evidence. Religion is about believing in a particular "absolute truth" regardless of evidence. They couldn’t be more different.
References :
well sorry to tell you, but you are simply wrong.
please point us to the source of your funny statement, that religion is regarded to be rational (pope himself says, religion is faith based).
And also plz point us to where religion states, that science is irrational.
Funny, that it was some catholic bishop who first figured out about the big bang.
References :
"What is the difference between religion and science?"
Science… based on FACTS.
Religion… based entirely on MAGIC.
This is not a toughie.
~
References :
Science is the study of things. Science proves the Bible.
The truth discounts your beliefs.
References :
Religion requires faith as it has no proof of said deity or verifiability of its doctrine. Science branches out into many areas where research and study takes place to make determinations, it has physical and tangible material to work with. The ‘irrationality’ of science, cut the mortality rate from infection due to the discovery of antibiotics, X ray machines so the the inside of your body can be examined to determine appropriate treatment, the vast amounts of study and research by scientist have benefited us all – to dismiss it a irrational is illogical. What can religion cure? What can it give us that is new? Nothing. 2000 years – and nothing, but the insistence the we obey or suffer. And that too, without evidence to back it up.
References :
I think therefore I am Atheist.
Hi .Considering that by definition science has nothing to say about the existence of God, it is strange that so many attempt to use science to kill God. This is irrational behavior since the argument violates the very precepts of its origin. writings are vague and obscure by all accounts, but what they really call into question imo is the circumscribed traditional western views of rationality.
References :
they are the same
References :
Your assumptions are wrong…
Religion does not share the perspective that it is a rational compendium of beliefs. It is not rational.
Rationality has the real say in discounting beliefs.
The problem is that irrationality is so ingrained within the religious community that it is nearly impossibly to reason with them…
Here – try a few:
1. Why does prayer fail so abjectly… Why does God never heal amputees?
2. How can you say acceptance of the sacrifice of Jesus is entirely voluntary when rejection imposes a mandatory, eternal, horrific punishment? Rather it is ultimate coercion.
3. How do you square the words of Jesus (Matthew 5:17-18; also, Luke 16:17) “Think not that I am come to destroy the law, or the prophets: I am not come to destroy, but to fulfill. For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.” with the “law” as practiced by the modern church? By obeying only certain portions of the Law – are you not risking ignoring a key provision of the Law that God doesn’t want discarded and thereby condemn an entire congregation to eternal hell? You either get it right or burn in hell forever?
4 Is there a “cherry picking” instruction in the bible? Are there “cherry picking” guidelines in the bible? If not then why not have slavery? How do you “cherry pick” the Bible and, yet, still consider it a divinely inspired, inerrant text? How can you NOT cherry pick the Bible, to remove evil commandments from God, even though by doing so the foundation of the Bible and of Christianity is undermined?
References :
Only one of them is true. Guess who?
References :